Dispute · Compensation

Defending the manufacturer against a compensation claim

When a long-standing distributorship relationship came to an end, the distributor asserted a claim based on the compensation regime under German law; the defence — conducted around the conditions of the claim, the source of the portfolio and the calculation method — was resolved through negotiation.

ScopeHGB 89bdefence against the claim
LanguagesTR·DE·ENWorking languages
Practice AreaDefenceclaim + negotiation
SectorDistributionGerman market
At a Glance
Our RoleDefence of the manufacturer/supplier side
Matter TypeGoodwill indemnity dispute
Client ProfileTurkish manufacturer (supplier)
Counterparty / StakeholderFormer distributor and its counsel
Working LanguagesTurkish · German · English
StatusCompleted · Anonymised matter
01 · Situation

The bill that arrives as the relationship ends: compensation

The claim rested on the assertion that the customer portfolio had been won through the distributor's efforts and that the manufacturer would continue to benefit from it.

The defence was structured along the lines that the portfolio arose from the brand's drawing power, that the statutory conditions were not met, and that the calculation cap had to be set correctly.

02

Our Approach

Keeping the commercial objective at the centre, we broke the legal risks into measurable steps.

01 · Case Analysis

The contract, the order history, and the customer-data sharing were examined against the conditions of the claim.

02 · Defence Construction

The defence under the headings of conditions, causation, and equity was supported by objections to the calculation method and the cap.

03 · Negotiation

With the litigation risk clarified for both sides, a resolution was reached through negotiation.

03

Chronology

The main stages of the process.

1ReviewAnalysis of the claimThe claim items and their bases were broken down.
2PositionLine of defenceThe objections on the conditions and the calculation were turned into a written position.
3NegotiationSettlement talksThe talks were conducted with the risks clarified for both sides.
4ClosingSettlement and releaseThe relationship was closed out with a release arrangement and predictable terms.
04 · Outcome

A claim closed through negotiation and a clean separation

The dispute was resolved through negotiation without being taken to litigation; a set of clauses managing compensation risk was left in place for future distribution agreements.

  • Resolution of the claim through negotiation
  • A release and closing arrangement
  • A clause set for future contracts
  • A network-wide risk map
06

Related Areas of Expertise

The practice and focus areas engaged on this matter.

Related Regional DeskGermany DeskAn end-to-end legal bridge in Türkiye for companies from the DACH region and in Germany for Turkish companies.See the regional desk
09

The Team on This Matter

Our multilingual team handling the matter.

First we clarify the commercial objective, risk appetite, timeline, and decision-maker needs. We then break the work into legal analysis, document/contract structure, and implementation steps, and manage the process through a single point of contact.

Because of the attorney's professional duty of confidentiality and client privacy, matters are anonymised. In a meeting, within the limits of confidentiality, we can describe our comparable experience more concretely.

In a short preliminary meeting, we take in the objective, the existing documents, the parties, the time pressure, and the critical risks. We then clarify the scope, team, timeline, and fee model.

Track Record

Let us set the strategy early in a similar dispute.

Let us manage your process from start to finish with our experience in similar cases.