Advisory · Legal Tech

Setting up an e-signature and electronic notification framework

The digitising signature processes were growing without any analysis of formal requirements. A transaction-to-signature map was drawn up, electronic-notification tracking was assigned to a responsible owner, and the approval workflows were made to produce evidence.

Scope5070transaction-signature map
LanguagesTR·DE·ENWorking languages
Practice AreaMappingtransaction-signature mapping
SectorTicaretcross-border operation
At a Glance
Our RoleCorporate counsel
Matter TypeE-signature and notification framework
Client ProfileTurkish-German trading company
Counterparty / StakeholderInternal stakeholders
Working LanguagesTurkish · German · English
StatusCompleted · Anonymised matter
01 · Situation

The validity question cannot be left for last

Some contracts had been formed with simple electronic approval, and the formal-requirement risk had gone unnoticed.

UETS (National Electronic Notification System) notifications were being tracked in individual e-mail accounts, which carried a deadline risk.

02

Our Approach

Keeping the commercial objective at the centre, we broke the legal risks down into measurable steps.

01 · Formalities Analysis

Transaction types were classified according to the written-form and secure e-signature threshold.

02 · Signature Framework

The wet-ink/secure e-signature/simple approval mapping was turned into a policy.

03 · Notification Tracking

KEP (Registered Electronic Mail)/UETS addresses and deadline tracking were assigned to a single owner.

03

Timeline

The main stages of the process.

1AnalysisTransaction inventoryProcesses requiring signature were listed.
2RulePolicy setThe transaction-signature map was approved.
3SetupWorkflow and logsThe approval workflows were made to produce records.
4TransferMonitoringNotification and exception tracking were systematised.
04 · Outcome

Valid and provable digital transactions

The digital signature processes were brought into a framework that complies with formal requirements, produces records, and does not miss notification deadlines.

  • A transaction-signature map
  • A logging and evidence framework
  • KEP/UETS deadline tracking
  • Management of exceptions through policy
06

Related Areas of Expertise

The practice and focus areas engaged on this matter.

Related Regional DeskLegal Tech DeskInternational advisory on process innovation, compliance and scalable legal architecture for legal-technology ventures and next-generation business models.See the regional desk
09

The Team on This Matter

Our multilingual team handling the matter.

First we clarify the commercial objective, risk appetite, timeline and the decision-maker's needs. Then we break the work down into legal analysis, document/contract structure and implementation steps, and manage the process through a single point of contact.

Owing to the legal profession's duty of confidentiality and client privilege, the files are anonymised. In a meeting, within the limits of confidentiality, we can describe our comparable experience more concretely.

In a short preliminary meeting, we take in the objective, existing documents, parties, time pressure and critical risks. Then the scope, team, timeline and fee model are clarified.

Track Record

To complete a similar matter with confidence.

Let us manage your process from start to finish with our experience in similar cases.