Before the authority, one channel, one consistent statement.

Scattered statements, the greatest risk

In periods of crisis or investigation, several authorities may knock on the door at once: tax, competition, KVKK, sectoral regulator, labour inspector. Answers given by different units without knowledge of one another produce contradictions and new investigations. The solution is to conduct all contact through a single channel, on the record, and with strategic coherence.

In unannounced inspections and searches, our teams provide on-site accompaniment: identity and authority checks, scope limitation, record-keeping discipline, and logging of seized material. Employees are given an inspection conduct guide in advance — it follows the same discipline as our search and seizure response.

One channel, one record, one strategy

The setup has four steps. Notification inventory: which authority can ask what, on which legal basis, within which deadline — prepared before any inspection is on the horizon. Channel protocol: a single point of contact is designated; who may speak with an inspector, who records, who escalates. Request-response workflow: every incoming request passes a legal-basis and scope check; answers leave from a single inventory with protective notations where needed. Follow-up: commitments given during an audit are tracked to completion, and the file is closed with a lessons memo. Deliverables: the authority map, the correspondence log and a response template set.

Time limits, and the routes of appeal

Behind the contact regime sits a discipline of deadlines. An annulment action against an administrative act is brought, as a rule, within sixty days under the Administrative Procedure Law (No 2577), and within thirty days before the tax courts; administrative fines run on the fifteen-day application windows of the Misdemeanours Law (No 5326); and sector-specific statutes add appeal stages of their own. Every day that passes without an answer shapes both the defence and the right to bring a case, which is why two dates are written on every piece of correspondence: the date the reply is due, and the last day of the route of appeal. A single line of reservation entered in the record at the close of an inspection can decide the case months later.

Typical multi-authority exposure

The service is most often used by companies exposed to several regimes at once — the KVKK (Law No. 6698), the Competition Law No. 4054 and tax inspections under the Tax Procedure Law No. 213 — and by Türkiye subsidiaries of German groups that must report every authority contact to headquarters in a consistent, bilingual format. Where an inspection escalates into a crisis scenario, coordination passes seamlessly to our first-48-hours response; where the answers require looking inward first, our internal investigations team establishes the facts before the authority does.